MILAN AREA FOCUS

Separation in Milan: timelines and Courts in Lombardy

Court of Milan: average timelines, established practice, particular features of the Family Sections and practical tips.

Avv. Teresa Lo Torto Founder · Court of Cassation Attorney January 5, 2026 5 min read

Court of Milan: average timelines, established practice, particular features of the Family Sections and practical tips.

Italian family law is national in scope, but its application is profoundly local. Two couples in identical circumstances who file for separation, one before the Court of Milan and one before a smaller provincial court, may receive their first hearing weeks or months apart, encounter different documentary requirements and meet different judicial expectations about the form and substance of their agreement. For anyone considering separation or divorce in Lombardy, an honest map of how the Milan courts operate is therefore as important as the legal framework itself.

The Court of Milan

The Tribunale di Milano is the largest civil court in Italy and one of the busiest family courts in Europe. Family matters are concentrated in the Ninth Civil Section, the so-called Sezione Famiglia, which sits in the Palace of Justice in Corso di Porta Vittoria and is organised into several panels of judges each with specific competence over separations, divorces, parental responsibility, civil unions and protection orders. Since the entry into force of the unified family proceedings introduced by Legislative Decree 149/2022, the Section has been progressively adapting its internal organisation and protocols to the new model.

The Court’s jurisdiction does not extend to the whole Lombardy region: it covers the Milan metropolitan area and a number of surrounding municipalities, while couples residing in Monza, Lodi, Pavia, Como, Varese, Bergamo or Brescia must file in their respective tribunals. For separation and divorce, the territorially competent court is, as a general rule, the one of the last shared matrimonial residence, as confirmed by the Court of Cassation in judgment no. 5544/2025. Where the spouses have transferred their residence to different judicial districts, the rule produces results that can surprise: a couple whose last common home was in Milan but who both now live in Rome will still find themselves litigating in Milan unless they jointly request a transfer.

International couples often need to assess at the outset whether the Italian courts have jurisdiction at all. EU Regulation 2019/1111 (Brussels II ter) and, for non-EU situations, Article 32 of Law 218/1995 govern the matter. Where Italian jurisdiction exists, the Milan Family Section is generally cooperative with foreign-language documents, accepts sworn translations promptly and is familiar with the use of remote attendance for parties resident abroad.

Average timelines of the procedures

The duration of a separation proceeding in Milan depends primarily on whether the parties are able to reach an agreement and, if they are not, on the complexity of the disputed issues. A consensual separation, in which both spouses file a joint petition setting out their agreement on every matter, including any children and property, is typically resolved in five to seven months from filing to the issue of the homologation order. The actual hearing before the judge, where the parties confirm their consent and the agreement concerning minor children is examined, is usually scheduled within sixty to ninety days of filing.

A judicial separation, by contrast, is a different exercise. After the introductory phase, the case enters a fact-finding stage that may involve documentary evidence, expert reports on assets and income, social-services interventions and the hearing of children. The Court of Milan currently resolves contested separations within eighteen to thirty months at first instance, with significant variation between panels and depending on the cooperativeness of the parties. Where complex valuations of business interests or international assets are required, longer timelines are not unusual.

Divorce proceedings normally follow the same pattern, with consensual divorces decided in approximately the same window as consensual separations and judicial divorces extending over comparable, sometimes shorter, periods because many disputed points have already been resolved at the separation stage. Out-of-court routes, notably the assisted negotiation procedure introduced by Law 162/2014 and the agreement before the Civil Registrar, can shorten the process considerably where neither spouse intends to contest the substance.

Established practice

Beyond the statutory rules, the Milan Family Section follows a body of local practice that practitioners working in the city know well and that often determines the practical course of a case. The Guidelines published by the Section in 2025 codify a number of these expectations. The petition is expected to be drafted with a clear and structured presentation of the family’s economic situation, supported by tax returns of the last three years, pay slips and a synthetic statement of assets and liabilities; vague references to a partner’s lifestyle, without underlying figures, are routinely sent back for supplementation.

The Section has also developed a consistent approach to interim orders. In the first phase of contested proceedings, the judge typically issues provisional measures on custody, residence of children and maintenance contributions within a short timeframe, often at the first hearing, with the aim of stabilising the family situation while the merits are explored. These provisional orders, although technically subject to modification, in practice influence the final outcome and should be prepared for with the same care as the merits.

A specific feature of Milan practice is the routine use of social services and, in higher-conflict cases, of court-appointed psychological experts to assess the parental capacities and the relational dynamics within the family. Knowing local practice is half the work: the same rule is applied differently by different Courts, and clients often benefit more from a lawyer’s familiarity with the Section’s tempo and expectations than from any abstract argument on the law. Studio Legale Lo Torto has acted before the Milan Family Section for many years and coordinates its Milan work with cases handled in Rome and Venice for clients with assets, residence or children in more than one Italian city.

  1. Judgment 2025
    Court of Cassation, Civil Div., Sec. I, no. 5544/2025
  2. Code
    Art. 706 Code of Civil Procedure — Form of the petition
  3. Reference
    Guidelines of the Family Section, Court of Milan 2025

DOMANDE FREQUENTI

Le domande più ricorrenti sull'argomento

AUTHOR

Avv. Teresa Lo Torto

Attorney since 1994, she founded her independent practice in 1997. In 2008 she earned, summa cum laude, the licentiate in canon law and trained at the Roman Rota in Rome. Admitted to the Italian Court of Cassation in 2016, she serves on the boards of non-profit organisations.

  • Admitted to the Court of Cassation since 2016
  • Member of the Venice Bar Association
  • Licentiate in Canon Law (2008)
  • 25+ years of experience

Disclaimer

The information in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each specific case requires individual evaluation by an attorney. The Studio is not liable for decisions made solely on the basis of the content presented here.

NEED ASSISTANCE?

Talk to our Lawyers

Every family matter requires a specific analysis. Contact the Studio to schedule a first consultation at our Milan, Rome or Venice offices.